Volume – 02, Issue – 01, Page : 01-18
FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE: INVESTIGATING LEGAL JURISPRUDENCE AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS IN THE PURSUIT OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Author/s
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Date of Publication
29th July 2022
Abstract :
This scholarly exposition endeavors to furnish a succinct panorama of the prominent theoretical frameworks that have wielded substantial influence upon the intricate tapestry of legal systems pervading global jurisprudence. It meticulously proffers a comprehensive spectrum of aspirations and perspectives emblematic of the scholastic and practical echelons within the ambit of comprehending the raison d’être of law in the societal milieu. The exegesis is meticulously dissected, delineating the contrasting paradigms of formalism and originalism, both of which underscore the salience of jurisprudential standards and axioms. Formalism, an erstwhile doctrine, predicates its tenets on an unwavering obeisance to the strictures of legal texts and precedents, irrespective of the contextual crucible of social or political exigencies. A conspicuous dissonance with the cherished tenet of the rule of law emerges within this doctrinal precinct. On the converse, originalism proclaims its allegiance to the discernment of legal texts predicated upon the unblemished fidelity to the intentions of their progenitors or framers. In the latter precinct of this paper, a panoply of paradigms surfaces, comprising pragmatism, legal pluralism, and restorative justice. Each represents an ideational crucible advocating for malleability, adaptability, and pliancy within the juridical edifice. The salient tenet of pragmatism proclaims that legal precepts find their zenith when they are amenable to contextual re-calibration. Legal pluralism, in contrast, posits a milieu wherein manifold legal systems coexist, each espousing its unique norms and canons. Proponents of restorative justice are imbued with the belief that the purpose of legal strictures should transcend retribution, instead aspiring to the reparation of fractured trust and interpersonal ties. The latter segment of this research diorama scrutinizes an amalgam of theories encompassing social contract theory, procedural justice, distributive justice, and substantive justice. These ontologies present a kaleidoscope of stratagems designed to engender equity and rectitude within the legal apparatus.
Keywords :
Critical Race Theory, Formalism, Legal Pluralism, Originalism, Pragmatism, Procedural Justice, Realism, Restorative Justice.
–
References :
- Alexy, R., & Dreier, R. (1990). The concept of Jurisprudence. Ratio Juris, 3(1), 1-13.
- An-Na’im, A. A. (2005). Globalization and Jurisprudence: An Isalmic Law Perspective. Emory lj, 54, 25.
- Attwooll, E. (1978). Perspectives in jurisprudence.
- Ballerini, J. E. (2009). The Apparent Agency Doctrine in Connecticut’s Medical Malpractice Jurisprudence: Using Legal Doctrine as a Platform for Change. Quinnipiac Health LJ, 13, 317.
- Barnett, H. (2013). Introduction to feminist jurisprudence: Routledge.
- Barnett, H. (2017). The province of jurisprudence determined—again! In Legal Theory and the Legal Academy (pp. 3-42): Routledge.
- Barnett, H. A., & Yach, D. M. (1985). The teaching of jurisprudence and legal theory in British universities and polytechnics. Legal Studies, 5(2), 151-171.
- Barron, A. (2000). Spectacular jurisprudence. In: JSTOR.
- Barton, T. D. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence, preventive law, and creative problem solving: An essay on harnessing emotion and human connection. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(4), 921.
- Bayles, M. D. (2017). What is jurisprudence about? Theories, definitions, concepts, or conceptions of law? In The Methodology of Legal Theory (pp. 3-20): Routledge.
- Bear, D. (2006). Establishing a Moral Duty to Obey the Law Through a Jurisprudence of Law and Economics. Fla. St. UL Rev., 34, 491.
- Berkheiser, M. (1999). Frasier meets CLEA: Therapeutic jurisprudence and law school clinics. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(4), 1147.
- Berman, H. J. (1988). Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: Politics, Morality, History. Calif. L. Rev., 76, 779.
- Bertea, S. (2005). Jurisprudence or Legal Science? A Debate about the Nature of Legal Theory. In: HeinOnline.
- Bix, B. (1995). Conceptual questions and jurisprudence. Legal Theory, 1(4), 465-479.
- Bix, B. (1999a). HLA Hart and the hermeneutic turn in legal theory. SMUL Rev., 52, 167.
- Bix, B. (1999b). On the dividing line between natural law theory and legal positivism. Notre Dame L. Rev., 75, 1613.
- Bix, B. (2000). Conceptual Jurisprudence and Socio-Legal Studies. Rutgers LJ, 32, 227.
- Bix, B. (2002). Natural law theory: The modern tradition.
- Bix, B. (2019). Jurisprudence: theory and context.
- Blanco, V. R. (2006). The methodological problem in legal theory: normative and descriptive jurisprudence revisited. Ratio Juris, 19(1), 26-54.
- Bodenheimer, E. (1974). Jurisprudence: The philosophy and method of the law: Harvard University Press.
- Boos, E. J. (1996). Perspectives in jurisprudence: An analysis of HLA Hart’s legal theory: Marquette University.
- Boyle, J. (1991). Is subjectivity possible-the post-modern subject in legal theory. U. Colo. L. Rev., 62, 489.
- Brown, W. J. (1909). Jurisprudence and legal education. Colum. L. Rev., 9, 238.
- Buckland, W. W. (2011). Some reflections on jurisprudence: Cambridge University Press.
- Burdon, P. D. (2012). A theory of earth jurisprudence. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY(37), 28-60.
- Burton, S. J. (1987). Ronald Dworkin and legal positivism. Iowa L. Rev., 73, 109.
- Cahn, E. (1955). Jurisprudence. NYUL Rev., 30, 150.
- Cain, P. A. (1988). Feminist jurisprudence: Grounding the theories. Berkeley Women’s LJ, 4, 191.
- Cain, P. A. (1996). The future of feminist legal theory. Wis. Women’s LJ, 11, 367.
- Cain, P. A. (2018). Feminist jurisprudence: Grounding the theories [1990]. In Feminist Legal Theory (pp. 263-280): Routledge.
- Chamallas, M. E. (2012). Aspen Treatise for Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory: Aspen Publishing.
- Chilovi, S., & Pavlakos, G. (2019). Law-determination as grounding: A common grounding framework for jurisprudence. Legal Theory, 25(1), 53-76.
- Chinhengo, A. (2000). Essential Jurisprudence: Routledge-Cavendish.
- Choudhury, S. (2021). A Study Of One Of The Most Fascinating And Ancient Theories Of Jurisprudence: The Natural Law Theory By Thomas Aquinas. Indian Politics & Law Review, 6, 1-19.
- Christie, G. C. (1973). Jurisprudence, Text and Readings on the Philosophy of Law.
- Cohen, F. S. (1937). The problems of a functional jurisprudence. Mod. L. Rev., 1, 5.
- Cohen, J., & Hart, H. L. (1955). Symposium: Theory and definition in jurisprudence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 29, 213-264.
- Cohen, M. R., & Cohen, F. S. (2002). Readings in Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy (Vol. 1): Beard Books.
- Coleman, J. (2003). The practice of principle: in defence of a pragmatist approach to legal theory.
- Cornell, D., Rosenfeld, M., & Carlson, D. G. (2014). Hegel and legal theory: Routledge.
- Cosgrove, R. A. (1996). Scholars of the law: English jurisprudence from Blackstone to Hart: NYU Press.
- Cotterrell, R. (1995). Law’s community: legal theory in sociological perspective: Oxford University Press.
- Cotterrell, R. (2000). Pandora’s box: jurisprudence in legal education. International journal of the legal profession, 7(3), 179-187.
- Cotterrell, R. B. (1992). The politics of jurisprudence: A critical introduction to legal philosophy: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Cowan, T. A. (1962). Notes on the Teaching of Jurisprudence. J. Legal Educ., 15, 1.
- Coyle, S., & Pavlakos, G. (2005). Jurisprudence or legal science: Hart Publishing.
- Crowe, J. (2011). Natural law beyond Finnis. Jurisprudence, 2(2), 293-308.
- Curzon, P. (1998). Jurisprudence Lecture Notes: Routledge.
- D’Amato, A. (2011). Whither Jurisprudence? Cardozo Law Review, 6(4), 1984-1985.
- Dagan, H., & Kreitner, R. (2010). The character of legal theory. Cornell L. Rev., 96, 671.
- Daicoff, S. (1999). Making law therapeutic for lawyers: Therapeutic jurisprudence, preventive law, and the psychology of lawyers. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(4), 811.
- Davies, H., & Holdcroft, D. (1991). Jurisprudence: Texts and commentary.
- Davies, M. (1994). Asking the law question.
- Dickson, J. (2001). Evaluation and legal theory: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Dickson, J. (2004). Methodology in Jurisprudence: a critical survey. Legal Theory, 10(3), 117-156.
- Douzinas, C. (2005). Critical jurisprudence: The political philosophy of justice.
- Douzinas, C., Warrington, R., & McVeigh, S. (1993). Postmodern jurisprudence: the law of the text in the text of the law: Routledge.
- Duke, G., & George, R. P. (2017). The Cambridge companion to natural law jurisprudence: Cambridge University Press.
- Dworkin, R. (1990). Bork’s Jurisprudence. U. Chi. L. Rev., 57, 657.
- Elliott, E. D. (1985). The evolutionary tradition in jurisprudence. Columbia Law Review, 85(1), 38-94.
- Ewald, W. (1995). Comparative jurisprudence (II): the logic of legal transplants. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 43(4), 489-510.
- Farrell, I. P. (2005). HLA Hart and the Methodology of Jurisprudence. In: HeinOnline.
- Ferrazzi, P., & Krupa, T. (2015). Therapeutic jurisprudence in health research: Enlisting legal theory as a methodological guide in an interdisciplinary case study of mental health and criminal law. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1300-1311.
- Finnis, J. (2012). Natural law theory: Its past and its present. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 57(1), 81-101.
- Galán, A., & Patterson, D. (2013). The limits of normative legal pluralism: review of Paul Schiff Berman, global legal pluralism: a jurisprudence of law beyond borders (Vol. 11): Oxford University Press UK.
- Georgiyevna, V. G. (2013). Jurisprudence (legal theory): a fresh approach to legal theory. Law and modern states(6), 5-8.
- Gleave, R. (2000). Inevitable doubt: Two theories of Shīʻī jurisprudence (Vol. 12): Brill.
- Golder, B. (2004). Rethinking the subject of postmodern feminist legal theory: towards a feminist foucaultian jurisprudence. S. Cross UL Rev., 8, 73.
- Golding, M. P. (1986). Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy in Twentieth-Century America–Major Themes and Developments. J. Legal Educ., 36, 441.
- Graveson, R. (1951). Teaching of Jurisprudence in England and Wales, The. J. Legal Educ., 4, 127.
- Grbich, J. E. (2013). The body in legal theory. In At the Boundaries of Law (RLE Feminist Theory) (pp. 61-76): Routledge.
- Green, L. (2017). General jurisprudence: a 25th anniversary essay. In The Methodology of Legal Theory (pp. 21-36): Routledge.
- Grey, T. C. (1989). Hear the other side: Wallace Stevens and pragmatist legal theory. S. Cal. L. Rev., 63, 1569.
- Hall, J. (1964). From legal theory to integrative jurisprudence. U. Cin. L. Rev., 33, 153.
- Hall, J. (1975). Integrative jurisprudence. Hastings LJ, 27, 779.
- Hallaq, W. B. (1993). Was al-Shafiʿi the master architect of Islamic jurisprudence? International Journal of Middle East Studies, 25(4), 587-605.
- Halpin, A. (2006). The methodology of jurisprudence: thirty years off the point. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 19(1), 67-105.
- Halstead, P. (2013). Key Facts: Jurisprudence: Routledge.
- Harris, A. P. (1994). The jurisprudence of reconstruction. Cal L. Rev., 82, 741.
- Harris, J. W. (1997). Legal philosophies.
- Hart, H. L. A. (1983). Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy: OUP Oxford.
- Hart, H. L. A. (2015). Philosophy of law and jurisprudence in Britain (1945-1952). Pravovedenie, 194.
- Herget, J. E. (1990). American Jurisprudence, 1870-1970: A History: Rice University Press Houston, TX.
- Herman, D. (1994). A Jurisprudence of One’s Own-Ruthann Robson’s Lesbian Legal Theory. Can. J. Women & L., 7, 509.
- Hicks, S. C. (1990). On the Citizen and the Legal Person: Toward the Common Ground of Jurisprudence, Social Theory, and Comparative Law as the Premise of a Future Community, and the Role of the Self Therein. U. Cin. L. Rev., 59, 789.
- Himma, K. E. (2002). Substance and method in conceptual jurisprudence and legal theory. In: HeinOnline.
- Himma, K. E. (2015). Conceptual Jurisprudence. An introduction to conceptual analysis and methodology in legal theory. Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law/Revija za ustavno teorijo in filozofijo prava(26), 65–92.
- Hochstrasser, T. J. (2000). Natural law theories in the early enlightenment (Vol. 58): Cambridge University Press.
- Horder, J. (2000). Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Fourth Series.
- Hughes, G., & Gross, H. (1966). Jurisprudence. Ann. Surv. Am. L., 711.
- Hutchinson, A. C. (2008). The province of jurisprudence democratized.
- Jacobson, A. (2000). Weimar: a jurisprudence of crisis: Univ of California Press.
- János, J. (2005). The four sources of law in Zoroastrian and Islamic Jurisprudence. Islamic Law and Society, 12(3), 291-332.
- Kamp, A. R. (2009). Jurisprudence: A Beginner’s Simple and Practical Guide to Advanced and Complex Legal Theory. Crit, 2, 62.
- Kelly, J. M. (1992). A short history of western legal theory.
- Kelsen, H. (1941). Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence, The. Harv. L. Rev., 55, 44.
- Kelsen, H. (2017). General theory of law and state: Routledge.
- Kennedy, D. (2000). From the Will Theory to the Principle of Private Autonomy: Lon Fuller’s” Consideration and Form”. Columbia Law Review, 94-175.
- Kennedy, K. A. (1997). Reaffirming the Natural Law Jurisprudence of Justice Clarence Thomas. Regent UL Rev., 9, 33.
- Kerruish, V. (2005). Jurisprudence as ideology: Routledge.
- Kissam, P. C. (2017). Disturbing images: literature in a jurisprudence course. In Legal Theory and the Legal Academy (pp. 105-127): Routledge.
- Kozyris, P. J. (1991). In the Cauldron of Jurisprudence: The View From Within the Stew. J. Legal Educ., 41, 421.
- Kramer, M. H. (1995). Critical legal theory and the challenge of feminism: A philosophical reconception: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Lacey, N. (2015). Jurisprudence, history, and the institutional quality of law. Virginia Law Review, 919-945.
- Lacey, N. (2017). Analytical jurisprudence versus descriptive sociology revisited. In Legal Theory and the Social Sciences (pp. 111-148): Routledge.
- Lasswell, H. D., & Macdougal, M. S. (1992). Jurisprudence for a free society: studies in law, science, and policy (Vol. 1): Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
- Leiboff, M. (2019). Towards a theatrical jurisprudence: Routledge.
- Leiter, B. (1997). Is There an American Jurisprudence. Oxford J. Legal Stud., 17, 367.
- Leiter, B. (2003). Beyond the Hart/Dworkin debate: The methodology problem in jurisprudence. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 48(1), 17-51.
- Leiter, B. (2004). The End of Empire: Dworkin and Jurisprudence in the 21st Century. Rutgers LJ, 36, 165.
- Leiter, B. (2017). Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: the methodology problem in jurisprudence. The Methodology of Legal Theory, 241-275.
- Lieberman, D. (2002). The province of legislation determined: legal theory in eighteenth-century Britain (Vol. 14): Cambridge University Press.
- Liewellyn, O. A. (1984). Islamic Jurisprudence and Environmental Planning. Journal of Research in Islamic Economics, 1(2), 25-49.
- Llewellyn, K. (2017). Jurisprudence: realism in theory and practice: Routledge.
- Luhmann, N. (1988). Law as a social system. Nw. UL Rev., 83, 136.
- MacCormick, N. (1994). Legal reasoning and legal theory: Clarendon Press.
- MacCormick, N. (2007). Institutions of law: an essay in legal theory: OUP Oxford.
- MacCormick, N., Weinberger, O., & MacCormick, N. (1986). On analytical jurisprudence. An Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism, 93-109.
- Mahajan, D. V. (2016). Jurisprudence & Legal Theory. In: Eastern Book Company.
- Mallory, C. L. (1999). Toward an ecofeminist environmental jurisprudence: Nature, law, and gender: University of North Texas.
- Marcus, D. (2009). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Legal Realism as a Jurisprudence of Law Reform. Ga. L. Rev., 44, 433.
- Marmor, A. (2005). Interpretation and legal theory: Hart Publishing.
- Martinez, G. A. (1995). The New Wittgensteinians and the End of Jurisprudence. Loy. LAL Rev., 29, 545.
- McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., & Reisman, W. M. (1967). Theories about international law: prologue to a configurative jurisprudence. Va. J. Int’l L., 8, 188.
- Menski, W. F. (2006). Comparative law in a global context: the legal systems of Asia and Africa: Cambridge University Press.
- Mikhail, J. (2002). Law, Science, and Morality: A Review of Richard Posner’s” The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory”. Stanford Law Review, 1057-1127.
- Minda, G. (1993). Jurisprudence at Century’s End. J. Legal Educ., 43, 27.
- Minda, G. (1996). Postmodern legal movements: law and jurisprudence at century’s end: nyu Press.
- Murphy, J. B. (1990). Nature, custom, and stipulation in law and jurisprudence. The Review of Metaphysics, 751-790.
- Murphy, J. G. (2018). Philosophy of law: An introduction to jurisprudence: Routledge.
- Murphy, M. C. (2003). Natural law jurisprudence. Legal Theory, 9(4), 241-267.
- Murphy, M. C. (2006). Natural law in jurisprudence and politics: Cambridge University Press.
- Murphy, M. C. (2015). Two unhappy dilemmas for natural law jurisprudence. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 60(2), 121-141.
- Murray, J. (2014). Earth jurisprudence, wild law, emergent law: The emerging field of ecology and law—Part 1. Liverpool Law Review, 35, 215-231.
- Murray, J. (2015). Earth jurisprudence, wild law, emergent law: The emerging field of ecology and law—Part 2. Liverpool Law Review, 36, 105-122.
- Nance, D. A. (1985). Legal Theory and the Pivotal Role of the Concept of Coercion. U. Colo. L. Rev., 57, 1.
- Nelson, W. E. (2003). Brown v. Board of Education and the Jurisprudence of Legal Realism. . Louis ULJ, 48, 795.
- Nobles, R., & Schiff, D. (2006). A sociology of jurisprudence: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Oh, R. (2003). Re-Mapping Equal Protection Jurisprudence: A Legal Geography of Race and Affirmative Action. Am. UL Rev., 53, 1305.
- Pannam, C. L. (1963). Professor Hart and analytical jurisprudence. J. Legal Educ., 16, 379.
- Patterson, D. M., & Patterson, D. (2010). A companion to philosophy of law and legal theory: Wiley Online Library.
- Patterson, E. W. (1958). Some Reflections on Sociological Jurisprudence. Va. L. Rev., 44, 395.
- Paulson, S. L. (1992). The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Oxford J. Legal Stud., 12, 311.
- Pearce, R. G. (2006). The legal profession as a blue state: reflections on public philosophy, jurisprudence, and legal ethics. Fordham L. Rev., 75, 1339.
- Peczenik, A., & Hage, J. C. (1989). On law and reason (Vol. 379): Springer.
- Penner, J., White, N. D., McCoubrey, H., & Melissaris, E. (2012). McCoubrey & White’s textbook on jurisprudence: Oxford University Press, USA.
- Penner, J. E., Schiff, D., & Nobles, R. (2002). Introduction to Jurisprudence and Legal Theory Commentary and Materials.
- Posner, R. A. (1990). The problems of jurisprudence: Harvard University Press.
- Posner, R. A. (1993). The material basis of jurisprudence. Ind. LJ, 69, 1.
- Posner, R. A. (1997). Reply to critics of the problematics of moral and legal theory. Harv. L. Rev., 111, 1796.
- Posner, R. A. (2004). Frontiers of legal theory: Harvard University Press.
- Posner, R. A. (2009). The problematics of moral and legal theory: Harvard University Press.
- Postema, G. J. (1998). Jurisprudence as practical philosophy. Legal Theory, 4(3), 329-357.
- Postema, G. J. (2011). A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence: Volume 11: Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Common Law World: Springer.
- Pound, R. (1925). Jurisprudence.
- Powell, R. (2009). Zakat: Drawing insights for legal theory and economic policy from Islamic jurisprudence. Pitt. Tax Rev., 7, 43.
- Priban, J. (2018). Sociological Jurisprudence: Juristic Thought and Social Inquiry. JL & Soc’y, 45, 330.
- Priel, D. (2007). Jurisprudence and necessity. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 20(1), 173-200.
- Priel, D. (2010). Description and evaluation in jurisprudence. Law and Philosophy, 29(6), 633-667.
- Pruitt, L. R. (1994). A survey of feminist jurisprudence. UALR LJ, 16, 183.
- Pufendorf, S., Behme, T., & Oldfather, W. A. (1931). Two books of the elements of universal jurisprudence: Liberty Fund.
- Purcell Jr, E. A. (1969). American jurisprudence between the wars: legal realism and the crisis of democratic theory. The American Historical Review, 75(2), 424-446.
- Quevedo, S. M. (1985). Formalist and instrumentalist legal reasoning and legal theory. Calif. L. Rev., 73, 119.
- Rappaport, A. (2003). The Logic of Legal Theory: Reflections on the Purpose and Methodology of Jurisprudence. Miss. LJ, 73, 559.
- Rappaport, A. J. (2004). Justifying Jurisprudence: Reflections on The Purpose and Method of Legal Theory. Available at SSRN 534884.
- Ratnapala, S. (2017). Jurisprudence: Cambridge University Press.
- Raz, J. (1998). Two views of the nature of the theory of law: A partial comparison. Legal Theory, 4(3), 249-282.
- Raz, J. (2009). Between authority and interpretation: On the theory of law and practical reason: OUP Oxford.
- Reisman, W. M. (1989). Theory About Law: The New Haven School of Jurisprudence. Wis-senschaftskolleg, JaHRBUCH (1989/90).
- Robertson, M. (2017). More Reasons Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy. Ratio Juris, 30(4), 403-416.
- Roederer, C., & Moellendorf, D. (2004). Jurisprudence.
- Sadurski, W. (1985). Giving desert its due: Social justice and legal theory (Vol. 2): Springer Science & Business Media.
- Saiman, C. (2007). Jesus’ Legal Theory—A Rabbinic Reading. Journal of Law and Religion, 23(1), 97-130.
- Samuel, G. (1990). Science, law and history: Historical jurisprudence and modern legal theory. N. Ir. Legal Q., 41, 1.
- Samuel, G. (1998). Comparative law and jurisprudence. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 47(4), 817-836.
- Sawyer III, L. E. (2001). Jurisdiction, Jurisprudence, and Legal Change: Sociological Jurisprudence and the Road to International Shoe. Geo. Mason L. Rev., 10, 59.
- Scales, A. C. (1985). The emergence of feminist jurisprudence: An essay. Yale Lj, 95, 1373.
- Schauer, F. (1987). The jurisprudence of reasons. In: JSTOR.
- Schlag, P. (2017). Spam Jurisprudence, Air Law, and the Rank Anxiety of Nothing Happening. Pravovedenie, 135.
- Schneider, A. K. (1999). The intersection of therapeutic jurisprudence, preventive law, and alternative dispute resolution. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(4), 1084.
- Schott, R. (1982). Main trends in German ethnological jurisprudence and legal ethnology. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 14(20), 37-68.
- Schubert, G. (2019). Human Jurisprudence: Public Law as Political Science: University of Hawaii Press.
- Sebok, A. J. (1998). Legal positivism in American jurisprudence: Cambridge University Press.
- Shapiro, M. (1963). Political jurisprudence. Ky. LJ, 52, 294.
- Sharpe, A. N. (2002). Transgender jurisprudence: Dysphoric bodies of law: Cavendish Publishing.
- Simmonds, N. (1985). Pashukanis and Liberal Jurisprudence. Journal of Law and Society, 12(2), 135-151.
- Simon, W. H. (2004). Toyota jurisprudence: legal theory and rolling rule regimes. Columbia Public Law Research Paper(04-79).
- Simpson, A. W. B. (1973). Oxford essays in jurisprudence, second series.
- Singh, C. (1990). Dharmasastras and contemporary jurisprudence. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 32(2), 179-188.
- Sinha, S. P. (1993). Jurisprudence, legal philosophy, in a nutshell.
- Smith, P. (2010). Feminist jurisprudence. A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, 290-298.
- Solum, L. B. (2003). Virtue jurisprudence a virtue–centred theory of judging. Metaphilosophy, 34(1‐2), 178-213.
- Solum, L. B. (2013). Virtue jurisprudence: Towards an aretaic theory of law. In Aristotle and the Philosophy of Law: Theory, Practice and Justice (pp. 1-31): Springer.
- Soper, P. (2007). In defense of classical natural law in legal theory: why unjust law is no law at all. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 20(1), 201-223.
- Stacy, H. (2001). Postmodernism and Law: Jurisprudence in a fragmenting world.
- Statham, B. (2008). Postmodern jurisprudence: Contesting genres. Law and Critique, 19, 139-164.
- Sternlight, J. R. (1995). Symbiotic Legal Theory and Legal Practice: Advocating a Common Sense Jurisprudence of Law and Practical Applications. U. Miami L. Rev., 50, 707.
- Stewart, R. B. (1987). Organizational Jurisprudence. In: JSTOR.
- Stone, J. (1944). The Province of Jurisprudence Redetermined. The Modern Law Review, 7(3), 97-112.
- Stone, S. L. (1992). In pursuit of the counter-text: The turn to the Jewish legal model in contemporary American legal theory. Harv. L. Rev., 106, 813.
- Strassberg, M. (1994). Taking ethics seriously: Beyond positivist jurisprudence in legal ethics. Iowa L. Rev., 80, 901.
- Stumpf, S. E. (1957). Theology and Jurisprudence. The Christian Scholar, 169-193.
- Summers, R. S. (1990). Judge Richard Posner’s Jurisprudence. Mich. L. Rev., 89, 1302.
- Susskind, R. (1987). Expert systems in law: Oxford University Press, Inc.
- Swygert, M. I. (1988). Striving to Make Great Lawyers–Citizenship and Moral Responsibility: A Jurisprudence for Law Teaching. BCL Rev., 30, 803.
- Tamanaha, B. (2011). What is ‘general’jurisprudence? A critique of Universalistic Claims by Philosophical Concepts of Law. Transnational Legal Theory, 2(3), 287-308.
- Tamanaha, B. Z. (1996). Pragmatism in US Legal Theory: Its Application to Normative Jurisprudence, Sociolegal Studies, and the Fact-Value Distinction. Am. J. Juris., 41, 315.
- Tamanaha, B. Z. (2001a). A general jurisprudence of law and society: Oxford Socio-Legal Studies.
- Tamanaha, B. Z. (2001b). Socio-legal positivism and a general jurisprudence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21(1), 1-32.
- Tamanaha, B. Z. (2013). The Unrecognized Triumph of Historical Jurisprudence. Texas Law Review, 91(3), 615.
- Tamanaha, B. Z. (2014). The third pillar of jurisprudence: social legal theory. Wm. & Mary L. Rev., 56, 2235.
- Tamanaha, B. Z. (2020). Sociological jurisprudence past and present. Law & Social Inquiry, 45(2), 493-520.
- Tan, S. H. (2017). Teaching legal ideals through jurisprudence. In Legal Theory and the Legal Academy (pp. 151-173): Routledge.
- Thomas, M. (2005). Indigenous jurisprudence and legal education in the 21st Century. ISAA Review, 4(1).
- Tobia, K. (2022). Experimental jurisprudence. The University of Chicago Law Review, 89(3), 735-802.
- Troper, M. (1988). Judges Taken Too Seriously: Professor Dworkin’s Views on Jurisprudence. Ratio Juris, 1(2), 162-175.
- Tucker, J. E. (2008). Women, family, and gender in Islamic law. Cambridge: Cambridge.
- Tur, R. (1978). What is jurisprudence? The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 28(111), 149-161.
- Twining, W. (1996). Globalization and Legal Theory. Current Legal Problems, 49(1), 1-42.
- Twining, W. (2000). Globalisation and legal theory: Cambridge University Press.
- Twining, W. (2003). A Post‐Westphalian Conception of Law. Law & Society Review, 37(1), 199-258.
- Twining, W. (2009). General jurisprudence: understanding law from a global perspective: Cambridge University Press.
- Valcke, C. (2017). Comparative law as comparative jurisprudence-The comparability of legal systems. In Legal Theory and the Legal Academy (pp. 361-388): Routledge.
- Vandervort, L. (2012). Affirmative sexual consent in Canadian law, jurisprudence, and legal theory. Colum. J. Gender & L., 23, 395.
- Veitch, S., Christodoulidis, E., & Goldoni, M. (2013). Jurisprudence: themes and concepts: Routledge.
- Vranes, E. (2006). The definition of ‘norm conflict’in international law and legal theory. European Journal of International Law, 17(2), 395-418.
- Wacks, R. (2020). Understanding jurisprudence: An introduction to legal theory: Oxford University Press.
- Waldron, J. (2008). Can there be a democratic jurisprudence. Emory lj, 58, 675.
- Walt, S. (2015). What can the history of jurisprudence do for jurisprudence? Virginia Law Review, 977-985.
- Ward, I. (2000). Universal jurisprudence and the case for legal humanism. Alta. L. Rev., 38, 941.
- Ward, I. (2012). Introduction to critical legal theory: Routledge-Cavendish.
- Weinrib, E. J. (1993). Jurisprudence of Legal Formalism, The. Harv. JL & Pub. Pol’y, 16, 583.
- West, R. (1985). Jurisprudence as narrative: An aesthetic analysis of modern legal theory. NYUL Rev., 60, 145.
- West, R. (2011). Normative Jurisprudence: an introduction: Cambridge University Press.
- West, R. (2018a). Jurisprudence and Gender [1988]. In Feminist legal theory (pp. 201-234): Routledge.
- West, R. (2018b). Women in the Legal Academy: A Brief History of Feminist Legal Theory. Fordham L. Rev., 87, 977.
- Wexler, D. B. (2008). Two decades of therapeutic jurisprudence. Touro L. Rev., 24, 17.
- Wexler, D. B. (2011). Therapeutic jurisprudence, criminal law practice, and relationship-centered lawyering. Chap. J. Crim. Just., 2, 93.
- Whitman, C. B. (1991). Feminist jurisprudence. In: JSTOR.
- Winick, B. J., & Wexler, D. B. (2006). The use of therapeutic jurisprudence in law school clinical education: Transforming the criminal law clinic. Clinical L. Rev., 13, 605.
- Witte, J. (2009). A demonstrative theory of natural law: Johannes Althusius and the rise of Calvinist jurisprudence. Ecclesiastical Law Journal, 11(3), 248-265.
- Wong, J. (1998). The anti-essentialism v. essentialism debate in feminist legal theory: the debate and beyond. Wm. & Mary J. Women & L., 5, 273.
- Xifaras, M. (2016). The global turn in legal theory. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 29(1), 215-243.
- Yntema, H. E. (1940). Jurisprudence on parade. Mich. L. Rev., 39, 1154.
- Zeiner, C. L. (2015). Getting deals done: Enhancing negotiation theory and practice through a therapeutic jurisprudence/comprehensive law mindset. Harv. Negot. L. Rev., 21, 279.
–
Interact on Social Media
FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE: INVESTIGATING LEGAL JURISPRUDENCE AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS IN THE PURSUIT OF LAW AND JUSTICE
— Social Science Chronicle (@SocSciChronicle) November 26, 2023
Author : Rosa Baionahttps://t.co/xMyTTkI8tb
WEB – PAGE COUNTER