Abstract :
The exploration of diverse theoretical frameworks within anthropology presents a comprehensive analysis of influential perspectives that illuminate the complexities of human societies, cultural dynamics, and behaviors. Examining foundational theories such as Cultural Materialism, Structural Functionalism, Symbolic Anthropology, Cultural Ecology, Post-structuralism, Evolutionary Anthropology, Feminist Anthropology, and Actor-Network Theory (ANT), this research paper delves into the multifaceted lenses through which social life is understood. Each theoretical framework contributes distinct insights and challenges conventional paradigms. Cultural Materialism, rooted in the material conditions of societies, offers a lens to understand the influence of ecological and economic factors on cultural practices. Symbolic Anthropology, focusing on the interpretation of symbols, underscores the role of symbols in shaping human behavior. Structural Functionalism emphasizes societal functions and interrelated parts that sustain equilibrium. Cultural Ecology examines the relationship between culture and environment, illuminating how societies adapt to their surroundings. Post-structuralism questions fixed meanings and the influence of power structures on knowledge. Evolutionary Anthropology studies human biological adaptations and societal development, while Feminist Anthropology critically examines gender roles and power dynamics. ANT, a unique perspective, focuses on human and non-human actors within networks and their influence on social structures. The critical analysis and synthesis of these frameworks offer a nuanced understanding of societal complexities and behaviors. The implications of these frameworks extend beyond academia, influencing societal discourses, interdisciplinary studies, and policy-making. The inclusivity and diverse methodologies presented foster a more comprehensive understanding of societal dynamics, encouraging cultural sensitivity and informed interventions. This exploration also signifies the continual evolution of anthropological thought and contributes to a more inclusive and diverse academic environment. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the multifaceted nature of human societies, cultural practices, and societal structures, offering valuable insights for diverse fields and broader societal discourses.

Keywords :
Actor-Network Theory, Anthropological Theory, Cultural Dynamics, Cultural Materialism, Evolutionary Anthropology, Feminist Anthropology, Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Post-structuralism, Social Structures, Symbolic Anthropology.

–

References :

• Aitchison, C. C. (2005). Feminist and gender perspectives in tourism studies: The social-cultural nexus of critical and cultural theories. Tourist studies, 5(3), 207-224.
• Baer, H. A., Singer, M., & Susser, I. (2013). Medical anthropology and the world system: critical perspectives: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
• Barrett, S. R., Stokholm, S., & Burke, J. (2001). The idea of power and the power of ideas: A review essay. American Anthropologist, 103(2), 468-480.
• Barth, F., Gingrich, A., Parkin, R., & Silverman, S. (2010). One discipline, four ways: British, German, French, and American anthropology: University of Chicago Press.
• Bashkow, I. (2004). A Neo‐Boasian conception of cultural boundaries. American Anthropologist, 106(3), 443-458.
• Benezra, A., DeStefano, J., & Gordon, J. I. (2012). Anthropology of microbes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(17), 6378-6381.
• Bessire, L., & Bond, D. (2014). Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American ethnologist, 41(3), 440-456.
• Bettinger, R. L., Garvey, R., Tushingham, S., Bettinger, R. L., Garvey, R., & Tushingham, S. (2015). Marxist and Structural Marxist Perspectives of Hunter-Gatherers. Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory, 163-185.
• Bieler, P., & Niewöhner, J. (2018). Universal biology, local society? Notes from anthropology. The Palgrave handbook of biology and society, 641-662.
• Bille, M., Hastrup, F., & Soerensen, T. F. (2010). An anthropology of absence: materializations of transcendence and loss: Springer.
• Birx, H. J. (2005). Encyclopedia of Anthropology: Five-Volume Set: Sage Publications.
• Bland, L., Harrison, R., Mort, F., & Weedon, C. (2013). Relations of reproduction: approaches through anthropology. In Women Take Issue (pp. 155-175): Routledge.
• Bloch, M. (2013). Marxism and anthropology: the history of a relationship: Routledge.
• Bloch, M. (2015). In and out of each other’s bodies: Theory of mind, evolution, truth, and the nature of the social: Routledge.
• Bodley, J. H. (2011). Cultural anthropology: Tribes, states, and the global system: Rowman Altamira.
• Borsos, B. (2017). Ecology+ Anthropology= Ecological Anthropology? Acta Ethnographica Hungarica, 62(1), 31-52.
• Boyer, D. (2014). Energopower: an introduction. Anthropological Quarterly, 309-333.
• Brannigan, J. (2016). New historicism and cultural materialism: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Bray, F. (2007). Gender and technology. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 36, 37-53.
• Brewton, V. (2005). Literary theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 29.
• Brondizio, E., Adams, R. T., & Fiorini, S. (2016). History and scope of environmental anthropology. In Routledge handbook of environmental anthropology (pp. 10-30): Routledge.
• Brownell, S., & Besnier, N. (2020). Gender and sexuality. In The Handbook of Sociocultural Anthropology (pp. 239-258): Routledge.
• Bubandt, N., & Otto, T. (2010). Anthropology and the Predicaments of Holism. Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology, 1-15.
• Buchanan, I. (2018). A dictionary of critical theory: Oxford University Press.
• Buchli, V. (2020). An anthropology of architecture: Routledge.
• Buss, D. M. (2001). Human nature and culture: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 955-978.
• Chagnon, N. A. (2007). Chronic problems in understanding tribal violence and warfare. Paper presented at the Ciba Foundation Symposium 194‐Genetics of Criminal and Antisocial Behaviour: Genetics of Criminal and Antisocial Behaviour: Ciba Foundation Symposium 194.
• Chodorkoff, D. (2014). The Anthropology of Utopia. Essays on Social Ecology and Community Development. Porsgrunn: New Compass.
• Cini, L., Chironi, D., Drapalova, E., & Tomasello, F. (2017). Towards a critical theory of social movements: An introduction. In (Vol. 17, pp. 429-452): SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.
• Clair, R. P. (2003). The changing story of ethnography. Expressions of ethnography: Novel approaches to qualitative methods, 3-26.
• Clifford, J., & Lederman, R. (2005). Unwrapping the sacred bundle: reflections on the disciplining of anthropology: Duke University Press.
• Conklin, A. L. (2013). In the museum of man: Race, anthropology, and empire in France, 1850–1950: Cornell University Press.
• Cornwall, A., & Lindisfarne, N. (2016). Dislocating masculinity: gender, power and anthropology. In Dislocating masculinity (pp. 27-61): Routledge.
• de Wolf, J. J. (2004). The predicament of writing the history of anthropology. Social Anthropology, 12(1), 103-111.
• Diah, N. M., Hossain, D. M., Mustari, S., & Ramli, N. S. (2014). An overview of the anthropological theories. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(1), 155-164.
• Dissanayake, E. (2001). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why: University of Washington Press.
• Dobres, M.-A., & Robb, J. E. (2014). Agency in archaeology: paradigm or platitude? In Agency in archaeology (pp. 3-17): Routledge.
• Donovan, J. M., & Anderson III, H. E. (2003). Anthropology and law (Vol. 1): Berghahn Books.
• Droogan, J. (2012). Religion, material culture and archaeology: A&C Black.
• Eller, J. D. (2015). Cultural anthropology: 101: Routledge.
• Eller, J. D. (2020). Cultural anthropology: Global forces, local lives: Routledge.
• Emberley, J. V. (2001). The bourgeois family, Aboriginal women, and colonial governance in Canada: A study in feminist historical and cultural materialism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(1), 59-85.
• Ensor, B. E. (2011). Kinship theory in archaeology: from critiques to the study of transformations. American antiquity, 76(2), 203-227.
• Erickson, P. I. (2011). Sexuality, medical anthropology, and public health. A companion to medical anthropology, 271-287.
• Eriksen, T. H. (2004). What is anthropology? : Pluto Press.
• Eriksen, T. H. (2020). Engaging anthropology: The case for a public presence: Routledge.
• Eriksen, T. H., & Nielsen, F. S. (2013). A history of anthropology: Pluto Press.
• Ervin, A. M. (2016). Cultural transformations and globalization: Theory, development, and social change: Routledge.
• Fischer, M. M. (2009). Anthropological futures: Duke University Press.
• Fuentes, A. (2018). Towards integrative anthropology again and again: disorderly becomings of a (biological) anthropologist. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 43(3-4), 333-347.
• García, M. D.-A. (2005). The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion: Taylor & Francis.
• Gilkeson, J. S. (2010). Anthropologists and the Rediscovery of America, 1886–1965: Cambridge University Press.
• Gillespie, S. D., & Nichols, D. L. (2003). Archaeology is anthropology: American Anthropological Association Arlington, VA.
• Gingrich, A., & Fox, R. G. (2002). Anthropology, by comparison: Psychology Press.
• Gledhill, J. (2009). Power in political anthropology. Journal of Power, 2(1), 9-34.
• Godelier, M., Young, K., & Edholm, F. (2013). Modes of production, kinship, and demographic structures. In Marxist analyses and social anthropology (pp. 3-27): Routledge.
• Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams: Springer.
• Graham, M. (2014). Anthropological explorations in queer theory: Taylor & Francis.
• Greenhouse, C. J. (2002). Introduction: Altered states, altered lives. Ethnography in unstable places: everyday lives in contexts of dramatic political change, 1-34.
• Gremillion, H. (2005). The cultural politics of body size. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 34, 13-32.
• Guenther, M. (2007). Current issues and future directions in hunter-gatherer studies. Anthropos, 102(2), 371-388.
• Hackett, R. I. (2005). Anthropology of religion. In The Routledge companion to the study of religion (pp. 156-175): Routledge.
• Hage, G. (2012). Critical anthropological thought and the radical political imaginary today. critique of anthropology, 32(3), 285-308.
• Haines, V. A. (2007). Evolutionary explanations. In Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology (pp. 249-310): Elsevier.
• Håkansson, N. T. (2017). Inequality and the return to structure in anthropology. Reviews in Anthropology, 46(2-3), 106-124.
• Hakken, D. J., Lessinger, H., Nash, J., & Babb, F. (2019). Perspectives in US Marxist anthropology: Routledge.
• Hann, C. (2018). Economic anthropology. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1-16.
• Harper, D. (2005). An argument for visual sociology. In Image-based research (pp. 24-41): Routledge.
• Harrison, F. V. (2008). Outsider within: reworking anthropology in the global age: University of Illinois Press.
• Harrison, F. V. (2016). Theorizing in ex-centric sites. Anthropological Theory, 16(2-3), 160-176.
• Hasse, C. (2016). Anthropology of learning: Springer.
• Hedican, E. (2012). Social anthropology: Canadian perspectives on culture and society: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
• Hendon, J. A. (2007). Living and working at home: The social archaeology of household production and social relations. A companion to social archaeology, 272-286.
• Hendry, J. (2017). An introduction to social anthropology: sharing our worlds: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Henry III, F., & Smith, E. A. (2012). How conservative are evolutionary anthropologists? A survey of political attitudes. Human nature, 23(3), 306-323.
• Hicks, D., & Beaudry, M. C. (2010). The Oxford handbook of material culture studies: OUP Oxford.
• Hird, M. J. (2004). Feminist matters: New materialist considerations of sexual difference. Feminist Theory, 5(2), 223-232.
• Howell, B. M., & Paris, J. W. (2010). Introducing cultural anthropology: A Christian perspective: Baker Academic.
• Humphrey, C. (2018). Marxism and neo-Marxism: London, Routledge.
• Iacovetta, F. (1999). Post-modern ethnography, historical materialism, and decentring the (male) authorial voice: a feminist conversation. Histoire sociale/Social History.
• Ingold, T. (2016). Evolution and social life: Routledge.
• Ingold, T. (2018). Anthropology: Why it matters: John Wiley & Sons.
• Inhorn, M. C., & Wentzell, E. A. (2012). Medical anthropology at the intersections: histories, activisms, and futures: Duke University Press.
• Jackson, J., & Depew, D. (2017). Darwinism, democracy, and race: American anthropology and evolutionary biology in the twentieth century: Routledge.
• Jackson, W. A. (2009). Economics, culture and social theory: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Joralemon, D. (2017). Exploring medical anthropology: Taylor & Francis.
• Joy, A., & Li, E. P. H. (2012). Studying consumption behaviour through multiple lenses: an overview of consumer culture theory. Journal of Business Anthropology, 1(1), 141-173.
• Kan, S. (2018). U nited S tates, Anthropology in. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1-30.
• Kaufman, S. R., & Morgan, L. M. (2005). The anthropology of the beginnings and ends of life. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 34, 317-341.
• Keane, W. (2003). Self-interpretation, agency, and the objects of anthropology: Reflections on a genealogy. Comparative studies in Society and History, 45(2), 222-248.
• Kearney, M. (2018). Reconceptualizing the peasantry: anthropology in global perspective: Routledge.
• Kertzer, D. I. (2005). Anthropological demography. In Handbook of population (pp. 525-547): Springer.
• Keyes, C. F. (2002). Weber and anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 233-255.
• Kimmel, M. S. (2000). The gendered society: Oxford University Press, USA.
• Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545-576.
• Kluckhohn, C. (2017). Mirror for man: The relation of anthropology to modern life: Routledge.
• Knauft, B. M. (2006). Anthropology in the middle. Anthropological Theory, 6(4), 407-430.
• Kohn, E. (2015). Anthropology of ontologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 311-327.
• Koskoff, E. (2014). A feminist ethnomusicology. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
• Kromidas, M. (2014). The ‘savage’child and the nature of race: Posthuman interventions from New York City. Anthropological Theory, 14(4), 422-441.
• Kuper, A. (2014). Anthropology and anthropologists: the modern British school: Routledge.
• Laidlaw, J. (2013). The subject of virtue: An anthropology of ethics and freedom: Cambridge University Press.
• Lamphere, L. (2016). Feminist anthropology engages social movements. Mapping Feminist Anthropology in the Twenty-First Century, 41-64.
• Leacock, E. (2014). Behavior, Biology and 9 Anthropological Theory. Paper presented at the Behavioral Evolution and Integrative Levels: The Tc Schneirla Conferences Series, Volume 1.
• Leaf, M. J., & Read, D. (2012). Human thought and social organization: Anthropology on a new plane: Lexington Books.
• Leatherman, T., & Goodman, A. H. (2011). Critical biocultural approaches in medical anthropology. A companion to medical anthropology, 29-48.
• Leibowitz, L., Saliou, M., Chevillard, N., & Leconte, S. (2016). Women’s work, men’s property: The origins of gender and class: Verso Books.
• Leroy, F., & Praet, I. (2015). Meat traditions. The co-evolution of humans and meat. Appetite, 90, 200-211.
• Lettow, S. (2017). Turning the turn: New materialism, historical materialism and critical theory. Thesis Eleven, 140(1), 106-121.
• Lewis, H. S. (2009). The radical transformation of anthropology: history seen through the annual meetings of the American Anthropological Association, 1955–2005. Histories of anthropology annual, 5(1), 200-228.
• Lewis, H. S. (2013). In Defense of Anthropology: An Investigation of the Critique of Anthropology: Transaction Publishers.
• Lewis, H. S. (2017). Anthropology or Cultural and Critical Theory? 1. In In Defense of Anthropology (pp. 199-206): Routledge.
• Little, P. E. (1999). Environments and environmentalisms in anthropological research: facing a new millennium. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28(1), 253-284.
• Llobera, J. R. (2003). An invitation to anthropology: the structure, evolution and cultural identity of human societies: Berghahn Books.
• Low, S. M. (2009). Towards an anthropological theory of space and place.
• Lyle, H. F., & Smith, E. A. (2012). How conservative are evolutionary anthropologists? A survey of political attitudes. Human nature, 23, 306-322.
• Lyons, D., & Casey, J. (2016). It’sa material world: the critical and on-going value of ethnoarchaeology in understanding variation, change and materiality. World archaeology, 48(5), 609-627.
• Macdonald, S. (2001). British social anthropology. Handbook of ethnography, 60-79.
• Marcus, A. (2008). Interrogating the neo-pluralist orthodoxy in American anthropology. Dialectical Anthropology, 32, 59-86.
• Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. (2014). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences: University of Chicago press.
• Mascia-Lees, F. E., & Black, N. J. (2016). Gender and anthropology: Waveland Press.
• Maurer, B. (2006). In the matter of Marxism. Handbook of material culture, 13-28.
• McCoid, C. H. (2008). Eleanor Burke Leacock and intersectionality: Materialism, dialectics, and transformation. Race, Gender & Class, 24-41.
• McCoy, S. B. (2007). Interpreting the organization of culture: A historical provisional approach to organizational culture: California State University, Fullerton.
• McGee, R. J., & Warms, R. L. (2013). Theory in social and cultural anthropology: An encyclopedia: Sage Publications.
• McGuigan, J., & Moran, M. (2014). Raymond Williams and sociology. The Sociological Review, 62(1), 167-188.
• Mead, M. (2017). Continuities in cultural evolution: Routledge.
• Miller, C. (2017). Design+ anthropology: Converging pathways in anthropology and design: Routledge.
• Miller, D. (2012). Things ain’t what they used to be. In Interpreting objects and collections (pp. 13-18): Routledge.
• Milner, A. (2002). Re-imagining cultural studies: The promise of cultural materialism: Sage.
• Milner, A., & Browitt, J. (2013). Contemporary cultural theory: An introduction: Routledge.
• Milton, K. (2002). Environmentalism and cultural theory: exploring the role of anthropology in environmental discourse: Routledge.
• Moberg, M. (2018). Engaging anthropological theory: a social and political history: Routledge.
• Moore, H. L. (2007). The subject of anthropology: gender, symbolism and psychoanalysis: Polity.
• Moore, J. D. (2000). Visions of culture: An introduction to anthropological theories and theorists: Rowman Altamira.
• Morris, B. (2006). Religion and anthropology: A critical introduction: Cambridge University Press.
• Morris, B. (2014). Anthropology and the human subject: Trafford Publishing.
• Morris, B. (2015). Anthropology, ecology, and anarchism: A Brian Morris reader: PM Press.
• Morris, M. (2012). Concise dictionary of social and cultural anthropology: John Wiley & Sons.
• Murphy, R. F. (2002). American Anthropology, 1946-1970: Papers from the American Anthropologist (Vol. 3): U of Nebraska Press.
• Nelson, S. M. (2004). Gender in archaeology: analyzing power and prestige: Rowman Altamira.
• Nguyen, V.-K., & Peschard, K. (2003). Anthropology, inequality, and disease: a review. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1), 447-474.
• Nielsen, J. M. (2019). Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences: Routledge.
• Niewöhner, J. (2015). Infrastructures of society, anthropology of: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
• Nugent, S. (2016). Critical anthropology: Foundational works: Routledge.
• Ortner, S. B. (1999). The fate of” culture”: Geertz and beyond (Vol. 8): Univ of California Press.
• Ortner, S. B. (2005). Subjectivity and cultural critique. Anthropological Theory, 5(1), 31-52.
• Ortner, S. B. (2006). Anthropology and social theory: Culture, power, and the acting subject: Duke University Press.
• Ortner, S. B. (2016). Dark anthropology and its others: Theory since the eighties. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 47-73.
• Palomera, J., & Vetta, T. (2016). Moral economy: Rethinking a radical concept. Anthropological Theory, 16(4), 413-432.
• Palsson, G. (2018). Nature, concepts of. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1-8.
• Parvini, N. (2012). Shakespeare and Contemporary Theory: New historicism and cultural materialism: A&C Black.
• Paulson, S., Gezon, L. L., & Watts, M. (2003). Locating the political in political ecology: An introduction. Human organization, 62(3), 205-217.
• Paulson, S., Gezon, L. L., & Watts, M. (2005). Politics, ecologies, genealogies. Political ecology across spaces, scales, and social groups, 17-37.
• Poirot, C. (2007). How can institutional economics be an evolutionary science? Journal of Economic Issues, 41(1), 155-179.
• Rankin, K. N. (2004). The cultural politics of markets: Economic liberalization and social change in Nepal (Vol. 27): University of Toronto Press.
• Redclift, N. (2012). Rights in women: Kinship, culture, and materialism. In Engels Revisited (Routledge Revivals) (pp. 113-144): Routledge.
• Reysoo, F. (2014). Feminist anthropology meets development. In Under Development: Gender (pp. 42-60): Springer.
• Rivkin-Fish, M. (2010). Pronatalism, gender politics, and the renewal of family support in Russia: Toward a feminist anthropology of “maternity capital”. Slavic review, 69(3), 701-724.
• Rubin, G. (2009). The” political economy” of sex. Feminist Anthropology: a reader, 87.
• Ruttan, V. W. (2003). Social science knowledge and economic development: An institutional design perspective: University of Michigan Press.
• Ruyle, E. E. (2019). Rethinking Marxist anthropology. In Perspectives in US Marxist Anthropology (pp. 24-56): Routledge.
• Salomon, F. (2018). At the mountains’ Altar: anthropology of religion in an Andean community: Routledge.
• Salzman, P. C. (2001). Understanding culture: An introduction to anthropological theory: Waveland Press.
• Sanderson, S. K. (2001). The evolution of human sociality: A Darwinian conflict perspective: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Sanderson, S. K. (2007). Marvin Harris, Meet Charles Darwin. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
• Sanderson, S. K. (2015). Marvin Harris, meet Charles Darwin: A critical evaluation and theoretical extension of cultural materialism. In Studying Societies and Cultures (pp. 194-228): Routledge.
• Schein, L. (1999). Performing modernity. Cultural Anthropology, 14(3), 361-395.
• Shankman, P. (2017). It seemed like a good Idea at the Time. These” Thin Partitions”: Bridging the Growing Divide Between Cultural Anthropology and Archaeology, 45.
• Shapiro, W. (2009). Partible paternity and anthropological theory: the construction of an ethnographic fantasy: University Press of America.
• Sinfield, A. (2006). Shakespeare, authority, sexuality: unfinished business in cultural materialism: Routledge.
• Singh, P. K. (2002). Recent Trends in Anthropological Theories (A Brief Outline of Developments since 1950). The Oriental Anthropologist, 2(1), 1-17.
• Skoggard, I., & Waterston, A. (2015). Introduction: toward an anthropology of affect and evocative ethnography. Anthropology of Consciousness, 26(2), 109-120.
• Slaby, J., & Röttger-Rössler, B. (2018). Introduction: Affect in relation. In Affect in Relation (pp. 1-28): Routledge.
• Steedly, M. M. (1999). The state of culture theory in the anthropology of Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28(1), 431-454.
• Stocking, G. W. (2001). Delimiting anthropology: Occasional essays and reflections: Univ of Wisconsin Press.
• Strathern, M. (2005). Partial connections: Rowman Altamira.
• Suchman, L. (2011). Anthropological relocations and the limits of design. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 1-18.
• Susser, I. (2016). Considering the urban commons: Anthropological approaches to social movements. Dialectical Anthropology, 40(3), 183-198.
• Taylor, J. S. (2005). Surfacing the body interior. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 34, 741-756.
• Thelen, T. (2015). Care as social organization: Creating, maintaining and dissolving significant relations. Anthropological Theory, 15(4), 497-515.
• Trigger, B. G. (2003). Understanding early civilizations: a comparative study: Cambridge University Press.
• Trigger, B. G. (2019). Early Native North American responses to European contact: romantic versus rationalistic interpretations. In European and Non-European Societies, 1450–1800 (pp. 191-211): Routledge.
• Trotter, R. T., Schensul, J. J., & Kostick, K. M. (2015). Theories and methods in applied anthropology. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, 661-694.
• Vásquez, M. A. (2020). More than belief: A materialist theory of religion: Oxford University Press.
• Venkatesan, S., Edwards, J., Willerslev, R., Povinelli, E., & Mody, P. (2011). The anthropological fixation with reciprocity leaves no room for love: 2009 meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory. critique of anthropology, 31(3), 210-250.
• Vivanco, L. (2018). A dictionary of cultural anthropology: Oxford University Press.
• Walle, A. H. (2001). Exotic visions in marketing theory and practice: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
• Warin, M. (2015). Material feminism, obesity science and the limits of discursive critique. Body & society, 21(4), 48-76.
• Watts, M. J. (2016). anthropology, geography and the environment. The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Anthropology, 323.
• Weisberg, D. (2017). Theories about the origins of culture have never been very kind to women. In nineteenth-century, social-evolutionist accounts of the emergence of the civilizing institutions of family, clan, and property in works like JM McLennans Primitive Marriage (1865) or Lewis H. Morgans Ancient Society (1877) women appear, when they are lucky enough to escape female infanticide, as captured and. Indigenous Religions.
• Wilson, D. J. (2018). Indigenous South Americans of the past and present: an ecological perspective: Routledge.
• Womack, M. (2005). Symbols and meaning: A concise introduction: Rowman Altamira.
• Wyn-Davis, M. (2014). Introducing Anthropology: A Graphic Guide: Icon Books Ltd.
• York, R., & Mancus, P. (2009). Critical human ecology: Historical materialism and natural laws. Sociological Theory, 27(2), 122-149.
• Zuckerman, M. K., & Armelagos, G. J. (2011). The origins of bio-cultural dimensions in bio-archaeology. Social bioarchaeology, 13-43.

–

---

---

WEB – PAGE COUNTER